User Tools

Site Tools


book:001.richard

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
book:001.richard [2007/06/30 14:48] – external edit 127.0.0.1book:001.richard [2013/05/19 12:30] (current) jims
Line 24: Line 24:
  
 Richard Seymour, Richard Seymour,
-though not an original proprietor, was one of the early settlers of +though not an original proprietor, was one of the [[hartford|early settlers of 
-Hartford. Just when he joined the little settlement near "Dutch+Hartford]]. Just when he joined the little settlement near "Dutch
 Point" on the Connecticut river we do not know, but probably in Point" on the Connecticut river we do not know, but probably in
 1639, when we find his name in the list of those "inhabitants 1639, when we find his name in the list of those "inhabitants
Line 155: Line 155:
 the marriage took place in Farmington, rather than in Norwalk, where the marriage took place in Farmington, rather than in Norwalk, where
 Mercy lived. It was very common then for the man to record his Mercy lived. It was very common then for the man to record his
-marriage where //he //lived, for+marriage where //he// lived, for
 obvious reasons connected with inheritance. The apparent precipitancy obvious reasons connected with inheritance. The apparent precipitancy
 of the marriage of Richard's widow to John Steele may be remarked of the marriage of Richard's widow to John Steele may be remarked
Line 167: Line 167:
 dearth of available women, to marry her and bring her back from dearth of available women, to marry her and bring her back from
 Norwalk and her Ruscoe relatives there, with her three younger sons? Norwalk and her Ruscoe relatives there, with her three younger sons?
-Can she be blamed if it be considered who he was -"his place in +Can she be blamed if it be considered who he was -- "his place in 
-the sun" - to have made a "marriage of convenience,"+the sun" -- to have made a "marriage of convenience,"
 if such it was, though we can only speculate on that matter. if such it was, though we can only speculate on that matter.
  
Line 226: Line 226:
 standard spelling of the name seems to have been generally accepted. standard spelling of the name seems to have been generally accepted.
  
-<file+<blockquote
-         [The will of Richar]d Semer (1655) +[The will of Richar]d Semer (1655)\\ 
-         [             ] being very week & sike [           ] gods pon[?] +[             ] being very week & sike [           ] gods pon[?]\\ 
-      mercy in [           ] doe leve this as my [             ] doe first +mercy in [           ] doe leve this as my [             ] doe first\\ 
-      will and [  ] dust of w<sup>eh</sup> it was [//made //and my soul into the] +will and [  ] dust of w<sup>eh</sup> it was [//made //and my soul into the]\\ 
-      hands of God that gave it [and I doe will and] bequeath unto my Loving wife +hands of God that gave it [and I doe will and] bequeath unto my Loving wife\\ 
-      Mercy [Seamor] my whole Estate: viz: my house & Lands Cattle and [all] +Mercy [Seamor] my whole Estate: viz: my house & Lands Cattle and [all]\\ 
-      my moveables: Except that it is my Will that [my] Eldest sonn Thomas should +my moveables: Except that it is my Will that [my] Eldest sonn Thomas should\\ 
-      have two steeres [  ] year old and upward and my best cartt: +have two steeres [  ] year old and upward and my best cartt:\\ 
-      thease [to] receive soen after my decease: +thease [to] receive soen after my decease:
-         It is alsoe my will that my other three sons John & Zachary [and] Richard +
-      receive out of this Totall estate the sum of forty pounds each of them viz: +
-      fourty pounds to John and fourty pounds to Zachary and forty pounds to +
-      Richard: duly and faythiully to be payd to them severally at the age of twenty- +
-      one years: Unles the Executo<sup>rs</sup> of this my Will shall see cause to doe it soener: +
-      It is alsoe my Will that my loving wife should have the dispose of my three +
-      sons John Zachary & Richard untill such time as they shall be fit to receive and +
-      dispose of ther Estate: It is alsoe my will and apoyntment that my loving Wife +
-      Mercy: togather with my faythfull freind Richard Olmsted be the sole Executo<sup>rs</sup> +
-      and Administrato<sup>rs</sup> of this my Last Will and Testament the aforesaid Legasies +
-      and all Lawfull debts and demands duly discharged by my loving wife Mercy: +
-      It is my will that shee posses and enioy all the rest of my Estate. to this my +
-      will and Testament I have set to my hand this 29th July 1655: +
-         In the presence of us +
-      Thomas Handford                              the marke of Richard //f// Seamer +
-      Jno Rescoe+
  
-            25 octobar 1655 +It is alsoe my will that my other three sons John & Zachary [and] Richard\\ 
-         The Court haveing examined the will of Richard Seamor they doe approve +receive out of this Totall estate the sum of forty pounds each of them viz:\\ 
-      therof +fourty pounds to John and fourty pounds to Zachary and forty pounds to\\ 
-                                                   William Hill: Secretary +Richard: duly and faythiully to be payd to them severally at the age of twenty-\\ 
-</file>+one years: Unles the Executo<sup>rs</sup> of this my Will shall see cause to doe it soener:\\ 
 +It is alsoe my Will that my loving wife should have the dispose of my three\\ 
 +sons John Zachary & Richard untill such time as they shall be fit to receive and\\ 
 +dispose of ther Estate: It is alsoe my will and apoyntment that my loving Wife\\ 
 +Mercy: togather with my faythfull freind Richard Olmsted be the sole Executo<sup>rs</sup>\\ 
 +and Administrato<sup>rs</sup> of this my Last Will and Testament the aforesaid Legasies\\ 
 +and all Lawfull debts and demands duly discharged by my loving wife Mercy:\\ 
 +It is my will that shee posses and enioy all the rest of my Estate. to this my\\ 
 +will and Testament I have set to my hand this 29th July 1655: 
 + 
 +In the presence of us\\ 
 +Thomas Handford                              the marke of Richard //f// Seamer\\ 
 +Jno Rescoe 
 + 
 +25 octobar 1655\\ 
 + 
 +The Court haveing examined the will of Richard Seamor they doe approve\\ 
 +therof 
 + 
 +William Hill: Secretary 
 +</blockquote>
  
 The top section of The top section of
Line 290: Line 294:
 | In bookes | [01-00-00] | | In bookes | [01-00-00] |
 | In armes and ammunition | [03-02-00] | | In armes and ammunition | [03-02-00] |
-| |  ----  |+| |  ---- |
 | Totall | [255-09-00] | | Totall | [255-09-00] |
  
Line 344: Line 348:
 | 5. | vi. | [[005.Richard|RICHARD]], b. at Hartford, Conn. | | 5. | vi. | [[005.Richard|RICHARD]], b. at Hartford, Conn. |
  
-\\ +\\ [[english_origin|(<-- The English Origin)]] [[start|(Back to Start)]] [[002.thomas|(2. Thomas(2) Seymour -->)]]
-[[english_origin|(<-- The English Origin)]] [[start|(Back to Start)]] [[002.thomas|(2. Thomas(2) Seymour -->)]]+
  
book/001.richard.1183232931.txt.gz · Last modified: 2011/05/25 08:16 (external edit)