User Tools

Site Tools


book:171.thomas

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
book:171.thomas [2007/02/15 20:45] jimsbook:171.thomas [2014/11/01 14:54] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
 +[[170.david|(<-- 170. David(6) Seymour)]] [[start|(Back to Start)]] [[172.william|(172. William(6) Seymour -->)]]
 +
 ====== 171. Thomas Youngs Seymour ====== ====== 171. Thomas Youngs Seymour ======
  
-{{ i470.thomasyoungs.jpg?300}}+[[i470.thomas|{{ i470.thomasyoungs.jpg?400}}]]
  
 171. MAJ. THOMAS YOUNGS<sup>6</sup> SEYMOUR 171. MAJ. THOMAS YOUNGS<sup>6</sup> SEYMOUR
Line 31: Line 33:
 Trumbull, 22 Sept. 1777. Trumbull, 22 Sept. 1777.
  
-> "Sir +<blockquote> 
->    I have the Honor to inclose your Excellency Copy of my Sons Letter, & +"Sir\\ 
-hope it may give some pleasure & Satisfaction-- I am with very great +I have the Honor to inclose your Excellency Copy of my Sons Letter, &\\ 
-Esteem +hope it may give some pleasure & Satisfaction-- I am with very great\\ 
->                                         Your Exc<sup>lys</sup> +Esteem\\ 
->                                               most ob<sup>t</sup> +Your Exc<sup>lys</sup>\\ 
->                                                  humble serv<sup>t</sup> +most ob<sup>t</sup>\\ 
->                                               Tho<sup>s</sup> Semour"+humble serv<sup>t</sup>\\ 
 +Tho<sup>s</sup> Semour" 
 +</blockquote>
  
 The enclosed letter, a copy of that written from Camp by Thomas Y. Seymour, The enclosed letter, a copy of that written from Camp by Thomas Y. Seymour,
 reads: reads:
  
-> "Hon<sup>d</sup> Sir +<blockquote> 
-> +"Hon<sup>d</sup> Sir\\ 
-I now attempt to give a relation of an Engag[e]ment between the Enemys + 
-whole Force & Gen<sup>l</sup>. Arnolds Division, it began in the morning of the 19<sup>th</sup>+I now attempt to give a relation of an Engag[e]ment between the Enemys\\ 
-instant between some Advanced Parties till noon, soon after which it became +whole Force & Gen<sup>l</sup>. Arnolds Division, it began in the morning of the 19<sup>th</sup>.\\ 
-General, and an unusual Fire continued the whole day, we obliging the Enemy +instant between some Advanced Parties till noon, soon after which it became\\ 
-to quit the Field for three times, though they obstinately contended to keep +General, and an unusual Fire continued the whole day, we obliging the Enemy\\ 
-possession of it, -- the Action was Bloody & would undoubtedly have been +to quit the Field for three times, though they obstinately contended to keep\\ 
-decided, had not the Night parted us.--in the Course of the day 1000 were killed +possession of it, -- the Action was Bloody & would undoubtedly have been\\ 
-of the Enemy, & 46 taken Prisoners all british Troops, as they were in Front, +decided, had not the Night parted us.--in the Course of the day 1000 were killed\\ 
-& we lost in the above Action 34 kill'd 120 wounded & missing.--Some officers +of the Enemy, & 46 taken Prisoners all british Troops, as they were in Front,\\ 
-of Distinction were lost on our side, such as two Colonels and some of a +& we lost in the above Action 34 kill'd 120 wounded & missing.--Some officers\\ 
-less degree, the Militia of our State was engaged, & behaved bravely--Cap<sup>t</sup> +of Distinction were lost on our side, such as two Colonels and some of a\\ 
-Wadsworth of Hartford in particular has done himself eternal Honor, tho' +less degree, the Militia of our State was engaged, & behaved bravely--Cap<sup>t</sup>\\ 
-I am afraid [the] good man is mortally wounded--One of M<sup>r</sup> Tucker's Sons +Wadsworth of Hartford in particular has done himself eternal Honor, tho'\\ 
-was instantly killed after acting the soldier.--Our Tents are all Struck, and +I am afraid [the] good man is mortally wounded--One of M<sup>r</sup> Tucker's Sons\\ 
-we momently expect to put an end to the Warr in this department, god +was instantly killed after acting the soldier.--Our Tents are all Struck, and\\ 
-grant us success in a day so big with Jmportant Events--Gen<sup>l</sup> Lincoln is in +we momently expect to put an end to the Warr in this department, god\\ 
-the Rear of the Enemy, & will disappoint all possible hopes of their Retreat; +grant us success in a day so big with Jmportant Events--Gen<sup>l</sup> Lincoln is in\\ 
-their Situation, a[s] I observed in a former Letter is desperate, for they +the Rear of the Enemy, & will disappoint all possible hopes of their Retreat;\\ 
-fought as if it was so, yet the Spirit of our Troops & Consciousness of the +their Situation, a[s] I observed in a former Letter is desperate, for they\\ 
-Justice of our Cause made us an Overmatch for them--The Army still +fought as if it was so, yet the Spirit of our Troops & Consciousness of the\\ 
-Continue in Spirits and are doubly animated from the late Engag[e]ment-- +Justice of our Cause made us an Overmatch for them--The Army still\\ 
-I still Continue to be in health notwithstanding I experience great fatigues-- +Continue in Spirits and are doubly animated from the late Engag[e]ment--\\ 
-I am &c-- +I still Continue to be in health notwithstanding I experience great fatigues--\\ 
->                                                  Tho<sup>s</sup> Semour +I am &c--\\ 
-P.S. Various Reports say Gen<sup>l</sup> Burgoyne rec<sup>d</sup>. a fatal Shot in the Action +Tho<sup>s</sup> Semour\\ 
-abovementioned--we are this day joined by 200 Indians of the Onoiada Tribe +P.S. Various Reports say Gen<sup>l</sup> Burgoyne rec<sup>d</sup>. a fatal Shot in the Action\\ 
-& with the Riflemen are now gone to beat up the Enemys quarters--This +abovementioned--we are this day joined by 200 Indians of the Onoiada Tribe\\ 
-Letter I hope will be excused as it was written on my knee under Arms-- +& with the Riflemen are now gone to beat up the Enemys quarters--This\\ 
->     Camp advanced of Still Water Sep<sup>r</sup> 20th 1777."+Letter I hope will be excused as it was written on my knee under Arms--\\ 
 +Camp advanced of Still Water Sep<sup>r</sup> 20th 1777." 
 +</blockquote>
  
 Burgoyne's letter to Gen. Gates, 14 Nov. 1777, which got him into such very hot Burgoyne's letter to Gen. Gates, 14 Nov. 1777, which got him into such very hot
Line 120: Line 126:
 the Pension Office at Washington. the Pension Office at Washington.
  
-> "I, Susan Seymour, formerly Susan Bull, hereby certify that the annexed +<blockquote> 
-record taken from my Prayer Book is a true record of my marriage to +"I, Susan Seymour, formerly Susan Bull, hereby certify that the annexed\\ 
-Thomas Y. Seymour, and the oldest record I possess. +record taken from my Prayer Book is a true record of my marriage to\\ 
->                                     (Signed) Susan Seymour. +Thomas Y. Seymour, and the oldest record I possess.\\ 
-Sworn to, etc."+(Signed) Susan Seymour.\\ 
 +Sworn to, etc." 
 +</blockquote>
  
 Then follows a page cut out of an old prayer book, being Psalter for the Then follows a page cut out of an old prayer book, being Psalter for the
Line 130: Line 138:
 entry in ink as follows: entry in ink as follows:
  
-> "Thomas Y. Seymour married to Susan Bull, 30 Oct., 1784. +<blockquote> 
->                         Their Children. +"Thomas Y. Seymour married to Susan Bull, 30 Oct., 1784.\\ 
->             Tho. S. Seymour, born 6 Sept., 1785. +Their Children.\\ 
->             Mary Ann Seymour, born 16 June. 1789. +Tho. S. Seymour, born 6 Sept., 1785.\\ 
->             John Jay Seymour, born 5 Oct., 1791. +Mary Ann Seymour, born 16 June. 1789.\\ 
->             Charlotte Ann Seymour, born 19 Oct., 1794. +John Jay Seymour, born 5 Oct., 1791.\\ 
->             James Davenport Seymour, born 19 Dec., 1797, +Charlotte Ann Seymour, born 19 Oct., 1794.\\ 
->                  who died 2 June, 1802. +James Davenport Seymour, born 19 Dec., 1797,\\ 
->             Susan Elizabeth Seymour, born 6 May, 1800. +who died 2 June, 1802.\\ 
->             James Edward Seymour, born 21 Dec., 1802. +Susan Elizabeth Seymour, born 6 May, 1800.\\ 
->             Egbert Davenport Seymour, born 9 Oct., 1806."+James Edward Seymour, born 21 Dec., 1802.\\ 
 +Egbert Davenport Seymour, born 9 Oct., 1806." 
 +</blockquote>
  
 In addition, she filed the following: In addition, she filed the following:
  
-> "Being requested on behalf of Mrs. Seymour, widow of Thomas Y. +<blockquote> 
-Seymour, Esqr., late of Hartford, deceased. to state what I know respecting +"Being requested on behalf of Mrs. Seymour, widow of Thomas Y.\\ 
-the said Seymour having served in the American Army during the Revolutionary +Seymour, Esqr., late of Hartford, deceased. to state what I know respecting\\ 
-War, do say, that all the information I have was derived from said +the said Seymour having served in the American Army during the Revolutionary\\ 
-Seymour himself with whom I was in habits of friendly intercourse for many +War, do say, that all the information I have was derived from said\\ 
-years after the war. Major Seymour told me that he belonged to the Army +Seymour himself with whom I was in habits of friendly intercourse for many\\ 
-of 1776, and served in New York in the memorable campaign of that year. +years after the war. Major Seymour told me that he belonged to the Army\\ 
-That he belonged to the Northern Army in 1777 and was present at the surrender +of 1776, and served in New York in the memorable campaign of that year.\\ 
-of Burgoyne, and that he then commanded the only troop of horse that +That he belonged to the Northern Army in 1777 and was present at the surrender\\ 
-belonged to that army. That he escorted the British officers to their station +of Burgoyne, and that he then commanded the only troop of horse that\\ 
-in the neighborhood of Boston, and that he received from Gen. Burgoyne a +belonged to that army. That he escorted the British officers to their station\\ 
-present of a very beautiful leopard skin to be used as a cover for the saddle +in the neighborhood of Boston, and that he received from Gen. Burgoyne a\\ 
-in testimony of the General's estimation of the civil and obliging manner in +present of a very beautiful leopard skin to be used as a cover for the saddle\\ 
-which he performed his duty. The leopard skin I have often seen Major +in testimony of the General's estimation of the civil and obliging manner in\\ 
-Seymour use while commanding the Horse Guards in this town. And I +which he performed his duty. The leopard skin I have often seen Major\\ 
-further say that according to my recollection, I have heard Major Seymour +Seymour use while commanding the Horse Guards in this town. And I\\ 
-say he retired from the Army in the year 1778 and entered upon the study +further say that according to my recollection, I have heard Major Seymour\\ 
-of the law." +say he retired from the Army in the year 1778 and entered upon the study\\ 
->   Hartford, Aug. 13, 1838. +of the law."\\ 
->                                        (Signed) Nathl. Terry. +Hartford, Aug. 13, 1838.\\ 
-Sworn to, etc. +(Signed) Nathl. Terry.\\ 
->                                                 New Haven, 11 Aug., 1836.+Sworn to, etc.\\ 
 +New Haven, 11 Aug., 1836. 
 +</blockquote>
  
-> Mr. Jesse Charlton, +<blockquote> 
->    Sir: +Mr. Jesse Charlton,\\ 
->       Your letter of the 9th is received, and in reply I have to say that I left +Sir:\\ 
-the service in February, 1777, about the time that Col. Sheldon's Regiment of +Your letter of the 9th is received, and in reply I have to say that I left\\ 
-Light Horse (in which Mr. T. Y. Seymour commanded a company of troop), +the service in February, 1777, about the time that Col. Sheldon's Regiment of\\ 
-was raised. I therefore had personally no knowledge of his military service. +Light Horse (in which Mr. T. Y. Seymour commanded a company of troop),\\ 
-But his reputation for gallantry and faithful conduct was such and so unquestioned +was raised. I therefore had personally no knowledge of his military service.\\ 
-that I felt myself perfectly justified in introducing his portrait in the +But his reputation for gallantry and faithful conduct was such and so unquestioned\\ 
-picture of the Surrender of Burgoyne, and I have not the smallest doubt that +that I felt myself perfectly justified in introducing his portrait in the\\ 
-his widow has a just title to whatever compensation the Government of the +picture of the Surrender of Burgoyne, and I have not the smallest doubt that\\ 
-United States are accustomed to bestow upon the widows of their meritorious +his widow has a just title to whatever compensation the Government of the\\ 
-deceased officers of the Revolutionary War. With hearty wishes that Mrs. +United States are accustomed to bestow upon the widows of their meritorious\\ 
-Seymour's application may be successful, I am, Sir, +deceased officers of the Revolutionary War. With hearty wishes that Mrs.\\ 
->                                           Your obedient servant, +Seymour's application may be successful, I am, Sir,\\ 
->                                              (Signed) Jno. Trumbull.+Your obedient servant,\\ 
 +(Signed) Jno. Trumbull. 
 +</blockquote>
  
 The will of Susan Seymour of Bridgeport, Conn., dated 31 Dec. 1838, proved in The will of Susan Seymour of Bridgeport, Conn., dated 31 Dec. 1838, proved in
Line 191: Line 205:
  
 ^ Children by second wife: ^^^^ ^ Children by second wife: ^^^^
-| 262. | i. | [[262.thomas|THOMAS S.]]<sup>7</sup>, b. 6 Sept. 1785. ||+| 262. | i. | [[262.thomas_s|THOMAS S.]]<sup>7</sup>, b. 6 Sept. 1785. ||
 | | ii. | MARY ANN, b. 16 June 1789; d. at Hadley, Mass., 16 Jan. 1858; m. at Hartford, 4 May 1814, REV. JOHN<sup>7</sup> WOODBRIDGE, D.D., b. at Southampton, Mass., 24 Dec. 1784, d. at Waukegan, Ill., 26 Sept. 1869, s. of Dr. Sylvester<sup>6</sup> (John<sup>5</sup>, John<sup>4</sup>, John<sup>3</sup>, John<sup>2</sup>, John<sup>1</sup>) and Mindwell (Lyman). Nine children.((See the Woodbridge Genealogy (1883). There were eight daughters and one son, whowas the eighth John Woodbridge in direct line. We are informed that the latter's son,John<sup>9</sup> Woodbridge, enlisted with the Canadian forces at the beginning of the World War,and was killed at Vimy Ridge.)) || | | ii. | MARY ANN, b. 16 June 1789; d. at Hadley, Mass., 16 Jan. 1858; m. at Hartford, 4 May 1814, REV. JOHN<sup>7</sup> WOODBRIDGE, D.D., b. at Southampton, Mass., 24 Dec. 1784, d. at Waukegan, Ill., 26 Sept. 1869, s. of Dr. Sylvester<sup>6</sup> (John<sup>5</sup>, John<sup>4</sup>, John<sup>3</sup>, John<sup>2</sup>, John<sup>1</sup>) and Mindwell (Lyman). Nine children.((See the Woodbridge Genealogy (1883). There were eight daughters and one son, whowas the eighth John Woodbridge in direct line. We are informed that the latter's son,John<sup>9</sup> Woodbridge, enlisted with the Canadian forces at the beginning of the World War,and was killed at Vimy Ridge.)) ||
 | | iii. | JOHN JAY, b. 5 Oct. 1791; supposed to have been drowned while escaping from a British vessel in Chesapeake Bay, having been impressed into the British service. || | | iii. | JOHN JAY, b. 5 Oct. 1791; supposed to have been drowned while escaping from a British vessel in Chesapeake Bay, having been impressed into the British service. ||
Line 206: Line 220:
 | | | 7. | //Joseph Egbert//, b. 24 Feb. 1840; m. 24 Dec. 1869, Cora Rebecca Fuller. | | | | 7. | //Joseph Egbert//, b. 24 Feb. 1840; m. 24 Dec. 1869, Cora Rebecca Fuller. |
 | | vii. | JAMES EDWARD, b. 21 Dec. 1802; d. 10 Mar. 1816. || | | vii. | JAMES EDWARD, b. 21 Dec. 1802; d. 10 Mar. 1816. ||
-| | viii. | EGBERT DAVENPORT, b. 9 Oct. 1806; d. at Charleston, S. C., in 1837; m. at New York, N.Y., in 1828, SARAH ANN WILLIAMS, of Jamaica, L.I. They had one daughter:\ I. Elvira Adelaide<sup>8</sup>, b. at New York, 15 May 1829; m. at Paris, Pa., 20 June 1850, James Ferdinand Taunt, of Buffalo, N.Y.; res. Washington, D.C. Two children. ||+| | viii. | EGBERT DAVENPORT, b. 9 Oct. 1806; d. at Charleston, S.C., in 1837; m. at New York, N.Y., in 1828, SARAH ANN WILLIAMS, of Jamaica, L.I. They had one daughter:\ I. Elvira Adelaide<sup>8</sup>, b. at New York, 15 May 1829; m. at Paris, Pa., 20 June 1850, James Ferdinand Taunt, of Buffalo, N.Y.; res. Washington, D.C. Two children. ||
  
-MARY ANN<sup>7</sup> (SEYMOUR) WOODBRIDGE (1789-1858). Of Mary Ann Seymour,+**MARY ANN<sup>7</sup> (SEYMOUR) WOODBRIDGE** (1789-1858). Of Mary Ann Seymour,
 Major Thomas' second child, afterwards Mrs. John Woodbridge, I read: Major Thomas' second child, afterwards Mrs. John Woodbridge, I read:
  
-  Her elegant form, her noble and benignant countenance, her kind manners and +<blockquote> 
-gentle tones, and even her white dimity dress and black mantle, were well and +Her elegant form, her noble and benignant countenance, her kind manners and\\ 
-long remembered (p.86). She had the rare merit of daring to be singular, more +gentle tones, and even her white dimity dress and black mantle, were well and\\ 
-mild and more uniformly genial, with more blandness of manner and much +long remembered (p.86). She had the rare merit of daring to be singular, more\\ 
-more //tact// than her husband, she was equally brave and detennined. ("The +mild and more uniformly genial, with more blandness of manner and much\\ 
-New England Minister of Sixty Years Ago," by Rev. Sereno D. Clark, Boston, +more //tact// than her husband, she was equally brave and detennined. ("The\\ 
-1877, pp. 80-90.)+New England Minister of Sixty Years Ago," by Rev. Sereno D. Clark, Boston,\\ 
 +1877, pp. 80-90.) 
 +</blockquote>
  
 The book in question contains accounts of several Seymours, -- members of Mrs. The book in question contains accounts of several Seymours, -- members of Mrs.
 Woodbridge's immediate family. Woodbridge's immediate family.
  
-STEPHEN EDWARD<sup>8</sup> FULLER (1836- ), of Brooklyn, N.Y., used the two+**STEPHEN EDWARD<sup>8</sup> FULLER** (1836- ), of Brooklyn, N.Y., used the two
 wings conjoined in lure, forming the paternal coat of the family, in his wings conjoined in lure, forming the paternal coat of the family, in his
 correspondence, at least as early as 1880, prior to the appearance of the correspondence, at least as early as 1880, prior to the appearance of the
Line 229: Line 245:
 by the latter's father. His wife was a granddaughter of the family beauty, Mary by the latter's father. His wife was a granddaughter of the family beauty, Mary
 Juliana Seymour, and thus a cousin of Mr. Fuller. Juliana Seymour, and thus a cousin of Mr. Fuller.
 +
 +\\ [[170.david|(<-- 170. David(6) Seymour)]] [[start|(Back to Start)]] [[172.william|(172. William(6) Seymour -->)]]
  
book/171.thomas.1171593924.txt.gz · Last modified: 2007/06/30 14:48 (external edit)