seymour_bible
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| seymour_bible [2007/01/28 15:34] – created jims | seymour_bible [2018/01/01 18:12] (current) – jims | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| **by [[contact_me|Jim Seymour]]** | **by [[contact_me|Jim Seymour]]** | ||
| - | //Much of the material in this document derives from the introduction to the | + | //Much of the material in this document derives from the [[book:introduction| introduction]] |
| 1939 book [[book: | 1939 book [[book: | ||
| - | Jacobus and George Dudley Seymour.// | + | Jacobus and [[book: |
| Back in the late 1800' | Back in the late 1800' | ||
| - | old Bible, which he claimed was the family Bible brought over by Richard Seymour | + | old Bible, which he claimed was the family Bible brought over by [[book: |
| in 1639. In it, a genealogy was documented that linked Richard with Sir Edward | in 1639. In it, a genealogy was documented that linked Richard with Sir Edward | ||
| Seymour of Berry Pomeroy, whose grandfather, | Seymour of Berry Pomeroy, whose grandfather, | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| Sadly, the Bible was never scrutinized in detail for fifty years, and in that | Sadly, the Bible was never scrutinized in detail for fifty years, and in that | ||
| time, the belief of the royal ancestry spread across much of America. At least | time, the belief of the royal ancestry spread across much of America. At least | ||
| - | one article was written about the link: "The Royal and Noble Ancestry of the | + | one article was written about the link: //"The Royal and Noble Ancestry of the |
| - | American Seymours" | + | American Seymours" |
| The Journal of American History. Included with the article were copies of | The Journal of American History. Included with the article were copies of | ||
| several pages from the Bible. | several pages from the Bible. | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
| colonist' | colonist' | ||
| ancestry page]] for more information), | ancestry page]] for more information), | ||
| - | sham in history' | + | sham in history' |
| - | to believe! To this day, there are still Seymours who are convinced that they | + | to believe! To this day, there are still Seymours who are //convinced// that they |
| are related to the royal line. While it is possible that Richard, the colonist | are related to the royal line. While it is possible that Richard, the colonist | ||
| was related to the ducal Seymours, his line probably does not link up with the | was related to the ducal Seymours, his line probably does not link up with the | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
| very distantly. | very distantly. | ||
| - | We can thank the genealogists J. Gardner Bartlett and Donald | + | We can thank the genealogists J. Gardner Bartlett and [[wp>Donald |
| - | Lines Jacobus for setting the record straight, beginning with an | + | Lines Jacobus]] for setting the record straight, beginning with an |
| article in the New England Historical and Genealogical Register | article in the New England Historical and Genealogical Register | ||
| - | (1917), vol. 71. It was called "The English Home and Ancestry | + | (1917), vol. 71. It was called |
| - | of Richard Seamer or Semer of Hartford, Conn." and later | + | of Richard Seamer or Semer of Hartford, Conn."// and later |
| - | formed the basis of the 1939 book [[book: | + | formed the basis of the 1939 book //[[book: |
| - | "A History of the Seymour Family" | + | "A History of the Seymour Family" |
| - | Lines Jacobus and George Dudley Seymour. | + | Lines Jacobus and [[book: |
| Another document of interest is the article | Another document of interest is the article | ||
| - | [[robertwill|" | + | //[[robert_will|" |
| by S. Allyn Peck that was printed in the Connecticut Nutmegger, from | by S. Allyn Peck that was printed in the Connecticut Nutmegger, from | ||
| [[http:// | [[http:// | ||
seymour_bible.1170020051.txt.gz · Last modified: 2007/06/30 14:48 (external edit)
